Last word?

Swiss diplomat defends European Court solution

Article reuse Print this story
Foreign Affairs  
The main courtroom of the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg.Image Caption:

The main courtroom of the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. (G. Fessy @CJUE) and agencies

The European Court of Justice could settle differences between Switzerland and the European Union over their future bilateral relationship, a top Swiss diplomat has told the NZZ am Sonntag newspaper.

“It’s logical, as it’s European Union law that Switzerland says it wants to voluntarily accept in order to gain access to European markets,” Swiss State Secretary at the Foreign Ministry Yves Rossier told NZZ am Sonntag.
But he added that ultimately the government, parliament and the Swiss people would be the ones to decide.
The future of Switzerland’s special bilateral relationship with the EU has been blocked for a number of years. Brussels wants Switzerland to take over EU law automatically pertaining to the accords and for an international arbitration body to rule in controversial cases.
But Switzerland, which is not an EU member but has signed some 200 bilateral accords on a broad range of issues, rejects any measure which would force it to automatically adjust to developments in EU law, seeing this as an attack on its sovereignty. And so far it has always opposed a supranational body overseeing or ruling on differences.
Rossier told NZZ am Sonntag that exploratory talks between Switzerland and the European Union had identified a “practical, viable” solution that could reconcile their institutional positions.

Swiss-EU relations

Surrounded by Europe

Latest news


Study abroad still possible for Swiss students

Spending a year abroad is still an option for Swiss students

Swiss students will be able to continue studying abroad despite the European Union excluding Switzerland from the Erasmus+ exchange programme. Swiss voters in February approved controversial immigration curbs stalling bilateral relations with Brussels.  [...]

The immigration question: background and history

Immigration ballot

Vote is “wrong therapy” for a complex problem

Georg Kohler sees similarities between Switzerland and Asterix's village

Switzerland’s acceptance of the immigration initiative corresponds with the image of a sovereign and brave people which is deeply anchored within the collective national consciousness, says political philosopher Georg Kohler.  [...]

Challenging negotiations

EU immigration

Germany’s president questions Swiss voting system

German President Joachim Gauck, left, greets his Swiss counterpart Didier Burkhalter during an official visit

German President Joachim Gauck has criticised the Swiss system of direct democracy, calling it “dangerous when citizens vote on highly complex issues” in reference to the decision by the Swiss in February to curb immigration.  [...]


Rossier and David Sullivan, the Chief Operating Officer of the European External Action have held three rounds of exploratory talks – the last at the end of March - to try to find ways to bridge “incompatible” positions. A joint report is still expected.
If Switzerland makes concessions on EU proposals relating to institutional matters and EU law, Bern could conclude new bilateral accords which would be in Switzerland’s economic interest, Rossier told the Sunday paper. But if Switzerland decides to stick with its existing position, it could have “several economic disadvantages,” he added.
Without revealing any details, he said it was now up to the Swiss cabinet and the EU Council to decide whether they wanted to enter into formal negotiations over their future institutional relationship. 
Last summer, Swiss President Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf sent a letter to Brussels containing potential negotiable solutions. This was “received favourably” by the EU.
However, at the end of December EU transport and energy ministers formally adopted a list of complaints against Switzerland, declaring that bilateral accords were “at a dead end” and Switzerland should “dynamically assume” EU law.

Comments cannot be shown for the time being