Forging identity

A 200-year old battle unites and divides the Swiss

Article reuse Print this story
Napoleon's Grande Armee retreating from Russia across the Berezina, 26-28 November 1812Image Caption:

Napoleon's Grande Armee retreating from Russia across the Berezina, 26-28 November 1812 (akg images)

by Julia Slater,

It was supposed to be an easy, three week campaign: in June 1812 Napoleon led his Grande Armée of over a half a million men into Russia, but at the end of the year less than five per cent of that enormous force straggled back across the border.

Of the 9,000 or so Swiss who took part in the campaign – enrolled under Switzerland’s treaty obligations with France - about 400 returned to tell the tale.
It was a campaign with few pitched battles; many of those who died perished from cold, hunger and disease and in Russian guerrilla attacks.
But the three-day battle at Berezina, in modern Belarus, in which 1,300 Swiss troops helped to hold off the Russians until the retreating French army had crossed the river, is seared into Swiss consciousness. Only 300 survived.
In a speech delivered on Swiss National Day this year, Defence Minister Ueli Maurer of the Eurosceptic Swiss People’s Party, used the anniversary to warn against the European Union’s attempts “to subject us to its jurisdiction”.
Swiss troops were dragged into the Napoleonic wars because the Swiss “political élite” in the 1790s had been “hypnotised” by the new ideas coming from revolutionary France,  he explained. “They believed in a new, golden age. They saw their homeland as too small, too insignificant, too old-fashioned.”
In the face of more and more outrageous demands, they thought “they could satisfy the other side by giving in. Step by step they sacrificed the country’s sovereignty.”
Fribourg historian Alain-Jacques Tornare, a specialist in the period, who has written a book about Berezina and the 1812 campaign, told that Maurer’s speech had “infuriated” him. “In fact the Swiss managed their affairs very well. Napoleon wasn’t able to impose everything he wanted to on them. You can’t say Switzerland was just a French satellite – only to the same extent that all the other countries close to the French empire were.”

A new identity

But there is nothing new about using Berezina for political purposes.
All the historians to whom spoke pointed to the battle’s role in cementing Swiss identity at a time of upheaval.
The French invasion of Switzerland in 1798 had turned the old confederacy upside-down. Until then, the 13 existing cantons – all of them German-speaking - ruled over large swathes of the country as their “subject territories”. After initial attempts at centralisation failed, the Act of Mediation, promulgated by Napoleon in 1803, created a Switzerland of 19 cantons, where these territories had equal rights with their former rulers.
“Berezina showed that the Swiss were able to fight together, as equals, that the German-speakers were not superior to the French-speakers, that the men from Ticino [Italian-speaking] could be taken seriously, and were perfectly capable of fighting,” Tornare explained.
Ticino historian Damiano Robbiani, one of the co-authors of the book Milizie Bleniesi, published to mark the bicentenary, agrees. The Berezina story has been kept alive in a particular way in three villages of the Blenio Valley, where every year the men parade through the streets in traditional uniforms and to the sound of drums in a blend of religious and military ceremony.
“Before, when Ticino was ruled by the Swiss, it had no army. So now people started to learn the pleasure of wearing a uniform and firing off guns. The celebration is certainly linked to Ticino becoming fully Swiss,” he told
Jürg Stüssi-Lauterburg, head of the Federal Military Library, who strongly believes that the French invasion retarded the reform process in Switzerland rather than moved it forward as many historians argue, also sees Berezina as a uniting force.
“Berezina was the first occasion with the new set-up of the 19 cantons, when they proved what they were able to do together. It was exactly what was required: a modern act of heroism as proof that Switzerland was able to re-establish its independence from a military point of view as well.”
“People can have very different interpretations about Swiss history, but still agree on the importance of Berezina. 1812 was a heroic Swiss action, but at the same time it meant the end of the power of Napoleon. The conservatives liked to see Napoleon cut down to size. The Bonapartists could always cling to the fact that people fought for Napoleon. You had different interpretations possible for the main political camps for the same action.”

Exploiting the story

Different interpretations have also been given at different times. The Berezina song – expressing hope in a better future, apparently sung by one of the soldiers at the battle – became popular at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, at a time when Switzerland was pushing a national cultural policy, with events like the national exhibitions, and the establishment of the national museum.
During both world wars the Swiss recalled Berezina, not least after Hitler’s invasion of Russia in 1941.
“The Second World War provided such a clear parallel: Hitler being cut down to size,” Stüssi pointed out. “That feeling certainly gave new life to the old myth, but the myth goes back to 1812.”
Stefano Giedemann, another contributor to Milizie Bleniesi, says that when he looked at books on the 1812 campaign which had re-examined contemporary sources, he found some had their own agenda.
“There were several publications during the world wars which didn’t present the events 100 per cent accurately. Some elements were suppressed, others highlighted,” he said.

Personal impact

But the impact of Berezina was not felt just on the political level. “It was a total tragedy. No-one ever found out what had happened to many of the soldiers. The families couldn’t mourn them properly,” said Tornare. 
Not that the authorities at the time were unsympathetic, but in the chaos of the retreat it was impossible to keep track of events – added to which, wounded men and army records fell into enemy hands.
The human tragedy had practical implications as well, as Tornare discovered. “I’ve seen in the archives in Fribourg as late as the 1840s people asking about this or that person, because there was an inheritance to be settled. Since they had disappeared, they weren’t officially dead.”
No wonder that the very name of Berezina has entered the French language as a word for a total disaster.

Comments cannot be shown for the time being