Based in Brussels since 1972, Swiss business lawyer Jean Russotto has closely followed relations between Switzerland and the European Union for four decades. Relations are at breaking point, he says, but the situation is still salvageable.
Although Switzerland remains an important trading partner for the EU, Brussels is no longer prepared to have arrangements with Switzerland made to measure, according to Russotto. Switzerland cannot risk jeopardising its position in the internal market, he says. “It is time to widen the debate.”
swissinfo: Where were you on December 6 1992 when Switzerland said no to the European Economic Area?
Jean Russotto: At home in Brussels anxiously awaiting the results of the vote. I heard the result from Swiss diplomats in the afternoon. They were devastated, as was I.
swissinfo: In hindsight, was it justified? Hasn’t Switzerland managed to obtain everything it wanted through the bilateral agreements it concluded with the EU in 1999 and 2004?
J.R.: Switzerland has succeeded in rebuilding solid bridges with the EU. It participates in the internal market at a level of 80 per cent. But things have changed.
J.R.: Originally the bilateral approach was considered as a step towards a gradual adhesion to the EU. That aim was abandoned and bilateralism by sector became a doctrine in Bern. For its part, the EU, which has grown towards the east and the south of the continent, also changed its attitude. Switzerland remains an important partner for the EU but Brussels is no longer prepared to have everything made to measure for it. This is where the demand for institutional cooperation comes from.
swissinfo: The institutional problems are currently blocking the development of relations between Switzerland and the EU. Have we reached rupture point?
J.R.: Yes. The 27 members will adopt new conclusions on their relations with Switzerland in December. In 2008 and 2010 they outlined clear lines of thought on the future of bilateralism.
In 2012 they will take a position, among other things, on the proposals that Switzerland made in this context in June. The Swiss proposals will be deemed interesting but clearly insufficient. We are witnessing a doctrinal distancing between the two parties, which is where the blockage is coming from. It is up to the EU to assure as rigorously as possible the application of the rules of play of the internal market. Switzerland, on the other hand, is firmly attached to the notion of defending its sovereignty.
swissinfo : Is it impossible to overcome these entrenched positions?
J.R.: In Switzerland in any case the political class throw slogans around but they hardly reflect on the long-term objectives. They repeat the point that the EU is in full mutation, that its structure is becoming more and more variable. There seems to be a view that we can delay without risk, that Switzerland is going to conquer a particular square of the European chessboard anyway. This calculation is wrong. Although the large political equations will change, the EU will always stay the creator of norms that it will continue to export worldwide. The will to anchor Switzerland in the internal market, including institutionally, will not change.
swissinfo : And?
J.R.: We have to get out of this dangerous impasse. Bargaining limited to institutional questions will achieve nothing, given the entrenched positions of the two parties, and risks even calling into question the position of Switzerland in the internal market, from which Switzerland would suffer above all. The debate has to be widened, now.
swissinfo.ch : How?
J.R.: By relaunching without delay the idea of an agreement of association between Switzerland and the EU, in which both a sectorial and institutional dimension would be integrated. It would be about better regulating the working of the bilateral accords while integrating Switzerland more at the heart of the internal market – some dossiers, such as electricity or market approval for new chemical products are essential for Bern. In addition, as part of a renewal of bilateral relations, a genuine political dialogue could be established.
swissinfo : But isn’t it that Switzerland itself suggested, stating its wish to follow a global and coordinated approach in its relations with the EU?
J.R.: It is the only reasonable solution in effect, for the EU as well. But in this context it is necessary for Switzerland to demonstrate more flexibility in the institutional domain. It has to “de-mythify” the spectre of “foreign judges” threatening its sovereignty. Sooner or later, it will definitely have to recognise a certain primacy, yet to be defined, of European law.