The following content is sourced from external partners. We cannot guarantee that it is suitable for the visually or hearing impaired.
(Bloomberg) -- Nestle SA made its first concession to activist investor Dan Loeb, announcing Tuesday a $21 billion share buyback plan to boost its stock price. Don’t expect Loeb’s Third Point LLC to stop there.
Behind Loeb’s campaign is a push for Europe’s largest company to follow many of its blue-chip peers in sacrificing its top-notch credit ratings to capitalize on rock-bottom interest rates.
Just days after the hedge fund manager announced his stake in Nestle, the company said it plans a 20 billion-franc ($21 billion) share buyback program, which would boost its leverage to 1.5 times a measure of earnings by 2020 from a ratio of about 1 time. That’s unlikely to please Loeb, who is urging the packaged food giant to increase leverage to at least two times to “produce enormous capacity for share buybacks,” according to a letter to investors in his hedge fund Third Point.
While Nestle’s willingness to push up its leverage slowly is a reversal of Chief Executive Officer Mark Schneider’s previous policy on buybacks, it would put the company more in line with other corporate titans that have let credit ratings slip in an effort to boost a measure of profitability. Schneider said in February in his first public appearance as CEO that buying back stock is a lower priority than reinvesting in Nestle’s business and paying dividends.
Loeb is betting that pushing Nestle’s debt levels to at least two times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization wouldn’t have a dramatic impact on its credit rating and put its leverage ratio in line with its competitors. While the shares have rallied to a record high this year, his pitch to borrow to buy back stock is underpinned by a belief that Nestle can accelerate sales growth and boost earnings in coming years.
Negative interest rates in Switzerland also make repurchasing stock attractive. Cheap borrowing costs mean the company can buy back shares, reduce dividend payments, and thereby boost cash flow.
A representative for Vevey, Switzerland-based Nestle declined to comment. A spokesperson for Third Point in New York wasn’t immediately available for comment.
The company generates enough cash that it won’t need to sell assets or issue bonds to support the repurchases and will probably keep its near-perfect credit rating, said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Duncan Fox. Methodology that Moody’s Investors Service uses to assign grades shows a leverage ratio of 1.5 times Ebitda could be consistent with Nestle’s current AA-tier grade.
“They’re going to be generating a huge amount of free cash on an annual basis,” Fox said in an interview. “They could have done this at any time, and I expect Mark Schneider was thinking of doing it.”
Ratings across investment-grade issuers have declined in part because nearly a decade of ultra-low interest rates worldwide has already allowed legions of companies pile on debt in an effort to increase their stock prices.
Less than 11 percent of corporate investment-grade debt outstanding carries top AAA or AA grades, according to Bloomberg Barclays index data. A decade ago, more than 35 percent did. The share of notes that are rated in the lowest tier, BBB, has jumped to more than 43 percent, from about 25 percent a decade ago.
Nestle has long had the highest ratings among its peers. Loeb wrote in his investor letter that such creditworthiness “serves no real business purpose” for a company like Nestle, which has strong cash flow and is in an industry that fares better in economic downturns. Unilever NV is rated two steps below Nestle, while Danone SA and Kerry Group Plc are ranked in the triple-B range, the lowest tier of investment-grade.
Debt financing remains cheap enough that companies don’t face steep increases in their borrowing costs if their ratings slip, said Philip Zahn, an analyst at Fitch Ratings. The average non-financial company worldwide pays about 4.62 percent annually to borrow in the debt markets, compared with 9.84 percent for equity, according to data compiled by Aswath Damodaran, a finance professor at the Stern School of Business at New York University.
“It doesn’t really cost you very much to move down the ratings scale given the current interest rate environment,” Zahn said “That can and undoubtedly will change in time.”
Ratings companies have dinged issuers for buyback programs in the past. Moody’s has a negative outlook on Microsoft Corp.’s top credit rating and said it could downgrade the company if it “continues with aggressive shareholder returns.” Fitch Ratings cut the credit grades on Jack Daniel’s producer Brown-Forman Corp. and Chili’s Grill & Bar operator Brinker International Inc. last year, citing their stock repurchases.
So far, Nestle’s bondholders are shrugging off the risk. The company’s $550 million of 1.875 percent bonds due in 2021 gained 0.07 cent to 99.92 cents on the dollar on Monday and didn’t change hands on Tuesday, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
CEO Schneider seems more focused on boosting profit than rejiggering Nestle’s balance sheet and risking a ratings downgrade, CreditSights analysts Simon Atkinson and Maryum Ali said. “We wouldn’t be lightening up on a Nestle bond holding just yet,” they wrote in a note to clients Monday.
--With assistance from Thomas Mulier
To contact the reporters on this story: Claire Boston in New York at firstname.lastname@example.org, Scott Deveau in Toronto at email@example.com.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Nikolaj Gammeltoft at firstname.lastname@example.org, Dan Wilchins
©2017 Bloomberg L.P.