Voters reject proposal to scrap armed forces

Voters want to keep the army Keystone Archive

Voters in Switzerland have overwhelmingly rejected a proposal aimed at abolishing the armed forces.

Exit polls show the electorate has decisively voted down proposals to scrap the armed forces and to set up a voluntary peace corps.

A nationwide poll conducted by SRG-SSR-idée Suisse, shows four out of five voters have rejected the proposals, which had been put forward by a pacifist group.

Final results are expected within the next few hours.

Parliament, the government and most political parties had come out against the proposals by the group, Switzerland Without An Army.

The supporters argued that Switzerland does not need an army since there is no enemy. They proposed setting up a voluntary peace corps, funded by the government.

The Swiss electorate voted down a similar proposal in 1989, when it had received 36 per cent of the vote 12 years ago.

Sizeable minority

In that year, after sizeable minority indicated dissatisfaction with the military status quo, the Swiss government knew the vote could not be ignored.

During the 1990s, the number of soldiers in the army was reduced, as was the length of time each man was required to serve. In addition a civil service option was introduced, so that those who did not want to serve in the military had an alternative other than a prison sentence.

But none of this was enough for opponents of the army. Nico Lutz, leader of the Switzerland without an Army campaign, believes neutral states like Switzerland would be better off developing new methods of conflict resolution rather than continuing with the army.

“Autonomous self-defence is just not an option for Switzerland,” Lutz told swissinfo, “no one really believes that, not the army, and not the government.”

Realistic contribution to world peace

Instead of the army, Lutz wants Switzerland to set up a civilian conflict resolution body aimed at brokering peace in regions where there is tension and disagreement.

But keen supporters of the army like Maximilian Reimann, a Swiss People’s Party member of the Senate, say it would be ridiculous for Switzerland to go it alone by abolishing the army.

“Over 190 nations have armies,” Reimann reminded swissinfo, “many of them with very modern and sophisticated weaponry. I really don’t see why Switzerland should be the one country on earth not to have an army.”

Reimann maintains that the primary function of the Swiss army remains a defensive one, protecting the country from aggressors.

“The other two roles are internal security, with regard to terrorism for example, and international peacekeeping,” said Reimann.

Influence of September 11

Lutz agrees that the argument that the army can be used to defend against terrorism is a persuasive one, particularly in the wake of September 11.

But he maintains it is an argument that does not stand up to scrutiny.

“There is no army in the world that can defend a country against a handful of religious fanatics, armed with bombs, who turn civilian airliners into bombs,” said Lutz.

“Protection against terrorism is certainly a job for the intelligence services, and for the police, but it is not something the army can do.”

A unifying force

Under the Swiss constitution, every able Swiss male is called upon to serve in the country’s militia army. Women can take part on a voluntary basis.

Switzerland is relatively unusual in Europe these days, in that it continues to operate a militia style army in which every Swiss man must serve at regular intervals for a good part of his adult life.

But the Swiss army has long been seen as much more than a military force; it is also a significant part of Switzerland’s life and culture.

The army in its present form was first founded in the 19th century, just as Switzerland was becoming a constitutional confederation.

The idea of requiring every Swiss man to serve was also regarded as a way to unify a country that had four languages and many different cultures.

End of cold war

During the Second World 800,000 men served in the military, guarding Switzerland’s borders against potential invaders.

But in 1989 the end of the cold war brought questions about the real purpose of the army. With the fall of the Berlin Wall, it became clear that the Soviet Union’s perceived role as an expansionist aggressor was no longer really correct.

Overnight, the traditional role of the Swiss army, which was to defend Switzerland’s borders against invasion – presumably by the Soviet Union – disappeared.

Supporters of the army hope that the latest restructuring of the military, which includes decreasing the numbers of soldiers again, and lowering the age limit for serving to 32 years, will satisfy doubters that the army is really now a modern and flexible force suited to the 21st century.

swissinfo with agencies