Swiss perspectives in 10 languages

Axing of framework deal was unconstitutional, says professor

EU flag
Keystone / Olivier Hoslet

The unilateral decision to call off negotiations with the European Union (EU) was beyond the government’s remit, legal expert Thomas Cottier has said in the Sunday press.

Cottier, a professor emeritus of international economic law at the University of Bern, claims the government “overstepped its competencies”, the SonntagsZeitung newspaper reports.

At the end of May, the government ended seven years of negotiations with the EU on a framework deal which would have replaced the over 120 bilateral deals which have regulated Swiss-EU relations for the past decades.

eu and swiss flags


Swiss reject framework agreement deal with EU

This content was published on Citing “substantial differences”, the government has decided not to move ahead with a controversial institutional agreement on relations with the EU.

Read more: Swiss reject framework agreement deal with EU

Cottier says this decision has consequences reaching far beyond the mere end of negotiations: it means “the end of the bilateral approach”, he writes in a new publication.

“A strategic decision of this magnitude constitutionally requires parliamentary approval,” Cottier goes on, saying the government broke three constitutional articles – as well as parliamentary law – in sidestepping deputies in Bern.

And although the population did not constitutionally require a say on the issue, Cottier says direct democracy is also a victim: had the framework deal gone through parliament, citizens would at least have had the right to challenge it to referendum.

Parliamentarians are now not only entitled to, but “duty-bound” to challenge the government’s decision, whether through a parliamentary motion or by establishing a parliamentary enquiry, Cottier says.


New ideas

According to the SonntagsZeitung, the appraisal comes as a boost to pro-EU voices crafting their next move after the framework deal collapse.

Operation Libero, for example, a young, internationally-oriented and liberal group who run anti-populist campaigns, is already planning a people’s initiative to force the government back to the negotiating table.

A spokesman for the group told the SonntagsZeitung that they have drafted two alternatives to the framework deal, including one that goes beyond mere EU market access to include more wide-ranging cooperation on issues like climate.

The New European Movement, which includes parliamentarians in favour of closer EU ties, also plans to launch an initiative later this autumn, the paper reports. Their proposals will likely be geared towards full EU or EEA (European Economic Area) membership.

Cottier himself is president of the “Switzerland in Europe” association, which supports the EU project and works to promote better Swiss-EU relations.



Masked Palestinian members of the "Ezz Al-Din Al Qassam" militia, the military wing of Hamas, hold their weapons and pose for the media during a march on the streets of Gaza City, Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2013. Arabic on headband reads, "No God but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet, Ezz Al-Din Al Qassam brigade." (AP Photo/Adel Hana)


Swiss parties in favour of banning Hamas

This content was published on Swiss political parties want to ban Hamas and classify it as a terrorist organisation in Switzerland, which would prevent financing and propaganda activity.

Read more: Swiss parties in favour of banning Hamas

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative

You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at

SWI - a branch of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation SRG SSR

SWI - a branch of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation SRG SSR