Swiss enforcement of economic sanctions is ‘deficient’
Economic sanctions are the responsibility of the seven-member Federal Council in Bern
Keystone
The Swiss federal authorities fail to correctly monitor the application of economic sanctions, an influential Senate committee has warned.
This content was published on
2 minutes
Keystone SDA/sb
An evaluation published by the Senate Management Committee on Tuesday found that the Federal Council had a clear policy regarding economic sanctions coupled with appropriate legislation, but the implementation of sanctions was “deficient”.
Economic sanctions are the responsibility of the seven-member executive body and their application is binding when they are issued by the United Nations Security Council. For European Union sanctions – Switzerland is not a member of the 28-state bloc – the Swiss government implements sanctions on a case-by-case basis, while weighing up national interests.
In its latest assessment, the Senate committee calls for better supervision of sanctions by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). It claims SECO only monitors their implementation on an ad-hoc basis and does not make full use of the instruments at its disposal.
The report said checks were only carried out if an offence was highlighted and a procedure was only initiated if there was sufficient evidence. The committee added that SECO never carries out unannounced inspection visits to companies.
Customs checks
The committee said that applying sanctions to prohibited goods entering Switzerland should be the responsibility of the Federal Customs Administration (FCA). However, it found that prohibited goods were difficult to check and customs officers do not always prioritise them.
Applying financial sanctions was also problematic owing to their complexity, and controls were almost non-existent in this area, as for luxury products, the parliamentary committee said.
While trade sanctions are widely respected by firms, imports and exports of sanctioned goods continue. It highlighted several examples, such as to the Crimea region (11 cases of exports), to Syria (14 cases of exports of prohibited luxury goods) and to Iran (39 cases of precious metals exported).
The Federal Council has until January 18 to give a formal reply to the report.
Swiss regulator criticises banks for being lax with mortgages
This content was published on
Switzerland's financial watchdog has condemned a tendency for banks to apply less stringent internal guidelines for granting mortgage loans.
Uber drivers subject to the law on services in Geneva
This content was published on
The Federal Court has ruled against a Geneva-based company, a partner of Uber, which challenged its liability under the law on the hiring of services.
Swiss nuclear power plants are not at risk from flooding
This content was published on
According to an inspection by the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate, the safety-relevant buildings of the Swiss nuclear power plants are not at risk.
Swiss Fairtrade label breaks billion franc barrier in sales
This content was published on
Products with the Fairtrade Max Havelaar label generated sales of more than CHF1 billion in Switzerland for the first time last year.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.