As Ehud Olmert claims victory in Israel's election, Jews and Palestinians in Switzerland expect Israel to continue its unilateral approach towards its borders.

Thomas Stephens

Turnout in Tuesday's election was the lowest in Israel's history and voters turned away from conventional political parties to smaller parties. A coalition government is expected.

The Swiss foreign ministry was optimistic.

"The altered political landscape following both the Israeli and Palestinian parliamentary elections provides some hope that the two sides will choose the path of dialogue," foreign ministry spokesman, Lars Knuchel, told swissinfo.

Jewish groups and Palestinians in Switzerland were divided in their opinion.

"The results show that the Israeli people want to continue the move towards security and peace along the lines drawn by [former prime minister] Ariel Sharon," said Alfred Donath, president of the Swiss Federation of Jewish Communities.

"I cannot speak for all Swiss Jews because they do not have a monolithic thinking about the state of Israel, but all of them want the state to find a way to get to peace ... and the result of this election will allow that."

Erich Gysling, a Swiss expert on the Middle East, agreed. "Most Israelis are fed up with the situation and would like a clear solution," he told swissinfo (see related interview).

However Pierrette Iselin from Swiss-Palestinian support group Collectif Urgence Palestine believed Olmert's Kadima party, despite appearing liberal, just wanted to continue the occupation of the Palestinian territories.

"Although [the right-wing] Likud has dropped back, what is more alarming for us is the election of Shas, a far-right party which is extremely dangerous and open in its desire to eliminate Palestinians. How influential Shas will be is worrying," she told swissinfo.

Coalition challenge

Despite winning 28 seats, Olmert's centrist Kadima Party fared worse than expected, signalling he might struggle to sustain support for his plan to impose final borders with the Palestinians by 2010 by uprooting many West Bank settlements.

"Kadima's mandate is rather unclear," said Gysling. "One solution would be to form a coalition with [centre-left] Labor and then some smaller parties on the progressive or liberal wing, maybe Meretz.

"The other solution of course would be to form a coalition with Likud and parties to the right, but I don't think [Olmert] will do that."

On Wednesday Olmert said he would seek negotiations with the Palestinians but act on his own if necessary to draw final borders.

Donath is pragmatic. "I think it's probably better to negotiate than to take a unilateral move like in Gaza. But so far there is no one to speak to.

"Olmert wants someone on the Hamas side to discuss with but first they should renounce their aim to destroy Israel and throw the Jews into the sea."

Gysling is cautiously optimistic. "Before the election Likud said they were not going to have any sort of negotiations with the Palestinians. So it's a little bit more hopeful."

As for the chances of the various Middle East peace initiatives such as the Swiss-sponsored Geneva Accord, Gysling is less positive.

"The Geneva Accord is a highly interesting and decent formula but it's just not accepted – not by the Israelis and not by the Palestinians. It's just an intellectual game," he said.

"To talk of peace is an exaggeration."

swissinfo, Thomas Stephens

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI swissinfo.ch certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative