Include non-native species in biodiversity reports, says study
Biodiversity studies should include not only indigenous species but also the contributions of introduced species, both positive and negative, says a study by the University of Geneva (UNIGE).
This content was published on
2 minutes
swissinfo.ch/jc
Indices currently used to measure progress towards international conservation and sustainability goals focus only on the “native” component of biodiversity, says the studyExternal link, published in the journal PLOS Biology. But non-native species, while they may have harmful effects, can also contribute to the local environment.
Study author Martin Schlaepfer, a researcher at UNIGE’s Institute of Environmental Sciences, argues that current indicators give a biased view, and that all species should be included. “This is not only consistent with definitions of biodiversity but also will promote the idea that long-term, sustainable, human well-being is intricately tied to benefits derived from nature,” he argues.
Biologists generally favour the protection of native species. Introduced species, however, are viewed as undesirable by the conservation community because some can generate undesirable effects. “But around 88% of species introduced to Europe are not problematic,” says Schlaepfer. “And among those that do create a problem, we generally only look at their flaws, without factoring in the positive features they can also generate.”
Examples given in the study include the giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea), a species of plant introduced from North America. It is considered invasive in Switzerland because it can dominate environments bordering agricultural land. However, it is also appreciated for its ornamental and medicinal properties, and serves as a resource for insects. Similarly, American crayfish – which are invasive in European lakes – provide the catering industry with an important source of food.
“If you focus on trees in the Canton of Geneva, there are 88 indigenous species. But there are 597 introduced tree species in the canton!” Schlaepfer points out. “If we want to remain relevant for political institutions, we now need to consider nature in its entirety.”
First large-scale alpine solar plant approved in Switzerland
This content was published on
The approval was met with satisfaction by the project's organisers, but it also brings with it a certain amount of pressure.
Medieval squirrels may have ‘helped spread leprosy’
This content was published on
An examination of squirrel remains in the United Kingdom has opened up interesting questions and possibilities in terms of the history of the disease.
Swiss money laundering office registers record number of reports
This content was published on
The Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS) registered a record number of reports of suspicious activity last year.
Two teens accused of planning terror attack released from custody
This content was published on
The Schaffhausen judiciary has released the two teenagers from custody who allegedly planned bomb attacks in Switzerland.
This content was published on
The assessmentExternal link, done by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) every ten years and released on Monday, warns against complacency in environment decision-making as a result of assuming that everything is fine. “Access to information on the state of biodiversity and proactive awareness campaigns are necessary to correct what polls show is…
Swiss households fork out more to protect the environment
This content was published on
Between 2008 and 2016, Swiss spending on environmental protection rose by 5%, though its proportion of GDP slightly fell.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.