
UBS criticises Swiss proposal to change capital adequacy requirements

The major bank UBS has criticised a draft amendment to the Federal Capital Adequacy Ordinance in Switzerland.
+Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox
According to UBS, the “disproportionate” proposals for the treatment of the bank’s own software and deferred tax assets would destroy around $11 billion (CHF8.7 billion) in capital at the Group level. The ordinance requires banks and securities firms to hold sufficient capital to cover risks associated with their business operations
Overall, UBS lacks an in-depth impact assessment of the regulation, according to the consultation response published on Tuesday. In addition, the costs for capital estimated in separate studies are “not in line with reality”. In contrast to the “theoretically derived” costs of 3.2%, the company’s own studies arrive at capital costs of around 10%.

More
Switzerland outlines stricter too-big-to-fail banking rules
UBS also considers the Swiss government’s proposal to strengthen the AT1 capital (Additional Tier 1) held for crisis situations to be untargeted. The bank criticises the fact that the proposal does not provide for any transitional arrangements for the proposed “far-reaching changes”.
UBS supports the strengthening of financial stability in principle, provided that the implementation is “targeted, proportionate and internationally coordinated”, the bank emphasises in the consultation response. However, it is against “extreme capital measures” that are neither proportionate nor internationally coordinated.
With the consultation response, UBS is commenting on the consultation opened at the beginning of June on the amendment to the Capital Adequacy Ordinance. The ordinance does not cover the higher capital backing for UBS’s foreign subsidiaries that the Swiss government is seeking. This is to be regulated separately in a law.
Adapted from German by DeepL/jdp
We select the most relevant news for an international audience and use automatic translation tools to translate them into English. A journalist then reviews the translation for clarity and accuracy before publication.
Providing you with automatically translated news gives us the time to write more in-depth articles. The news stories we select have been written and carefully fact-checked by an external editorial team from news agencies such as Bloomberg or Keystone.
If you have any questions about how we work, write to us at english@swissinfo.ch.
News

In compliance with the JTI standards
More: SWI swissinfo.ch certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.