The United States will not be obliged to provide names or bank account numbers when seeking Swiss assistance on tax evaders under a new double taxation agreement.
This content was published on
1 minute
swissinfo.ch and agencies
Instead, it will be sufficient for the US to demand help based on a “pattern of behaviour” indicating suspicious actions on the part of a bank or financial establishment.
Details of the new agreement were revealed in official government documents published on Tuesday.
In cases where US authorities are able to supply enough details to justify a suspicious pattern of behaviour, Swiss banks will hand over the names and account details of US clients suspected of tax fraud – which happened to 4,500 UBS clients in 2009.
But provisions being submitted to the Swiss parliament this month insist that all “fishing expeditions” for information on the part of the Americans will be denied.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here. Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.
Read more
More
Banks say US tax deal must respect Swiss law
This content was published on
The US has turned up the heat on Switzerland after finding evidence that Credit Suisse and other banks allegedly helped its citizens to break the law by hiding their wealth from the tax authorities. The successful prosecution of UBS two years ago led to a Swiss-US treaty that severely dented Swiss banking secrecy laws by…
This content was published on
But if the deal is seen as a step forward by the media, questions remain as to whether it would survive political change in Berlin and the effects it will have on the Swiss banking industry. The Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ) called the accord a “big step forward”, even if concessions are made – referring…
This content was published on
Investigators have now escalated the probe and are attempting to implicate the bank in hiding some $3 billion (SFr2.46 billion) of client assets from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). They must prove that the bank’s hierarchy sanctioned staff actions before client data can be demanded in a re-run of the UBS case two years ago.…
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here. Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.