Is there such a thing as too much direct democracy?

Conservative isolationists want to make voters have the final say on every “important international treaty”, defying the government and parliament. But is this taking the democratic process too far?

This content was published on June 7, 2012 - 11:00

Billed as an initiative to boost direct democracy, the Campaign for an Independent and Neutral Switzerland group argues ordinary citizens have a better sense of foreign policy than the political elite and the business community.

Opponents say the initiative, which goes to a nationwide ballot on June 17, creates an unwieldy system, damaging Switzerland’s reputation as a predictable partner at the negotiating table and jeopardising the competitive edge of the country’s economy which has to be able to rely on legal certainty.

Most political parties, not only on the left but also in the political centre, argue the proposal by the isolationists risks undermining Switzerland’s cooperation on the international scene and puts an unduly heavy burden on the system of direct democracy. Voters would be called up around 500 times a year to decide on a host of highly technical and uncontroversial issues.

What do you think?

This article was automatically imported from our old content management system. If you see any display errors, please let us know:

In compliance with the JTI standards

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative

Contributions under this article have been turned off. You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here. Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at

Share this story

Change your password

Do you really want to delete your profile?