Zurich parliament insists on Bührle art collection provenance research
Select your language
Generated with artificial intelligence.
Listening:
Zurich parliament insists on Bührle art collection provenance research
The Zurich cantonal parliament is insisting that the Zurich Art Society and the Bührle Foundation clarify the provenance of all paintings at their own expense. On Monday, it wrote off the urgent postulate from politicians on the reappraisal of the Bührle collection.
+Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox
The parliament voted 87 to 83 in favour of the dissenting opinion requested by the Commission for Education and Culture (KBIK).
In 2022, the parliament narrowly referred the postulate, calling on the government to work with the City of Zurich to fully clarify the provenance of the paintings that the Bührle Foundation had lent to the Kunsthaus Zurich for exhibition.
More
Inquiry finds ‘tainted’ Bührle art collection needs much more provenance research
The report presented in 2024 by historian Raphael Gross made it clear that the Bührle Foundation’s research to date was insufficient, emphasised KBIK President Karin Fehr Thoma.
A majority therefore called on the Art Society and the Bührle Foundation, which are responsible, to clarify the provenance of all the paintings at their own expense
Time for a clean slate
Several political parties supported the dissenting opinion. One politician said that it was in everyone’s interest that “the slate is finally wiped clean”.
Politicians from the centre and right-wing parties spoke out against this. One said that the present report already “fully and completely” fulfilled its purpose and provided all relevant information.
Government minister Jacqueline Fehr emphasised that the canton shared political and ethical responsibility, but was standing on the sidelines in this matter. From a political point of view, responsibility lies with the city, and with the foundation and the art society for provenance research.
Translated from German by DeepL/jdp
How we work
We select the most relevant news for an international audience and use automatic translation tools such as DeepL to translate them into English. A journalist then reviews the translation for clarity and accuracy before publication. Providing you with automatically translated news gives us the time to write more in-depth articles. The news stories we select have been written and carefully fact-checked by an external editorial team from news agencies such as Bloomberg or Keystone.
Did you find this explanation helpful? Please fill out the short survey below to help us understand your needs.
External Content
Don’t miss your chance to make a difference! Take our survey and share your thoughts.
In compliance with the JTI standards
More: SWI swissinfo.ch certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.