The seven-member government agreed that Switzerland’s current approach as defined in 1993 remains valid and should not be adapted in the wake of the Ukraine war.
The government said in a report adoptedExternal link on Wednesday that Switzerland’s current neutrality practice “provides sufficient scope to use neutrality as an instrument of Swiss foreign and security policy in the present international context”.
The government had examined Swiss neutrality in the light of the war in Ukraine and in response to a question by the Senate foreign affairs committee. The cabinet discussed the issue in September.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has forced Switzerland to explain its neutrality. The Alpine nation has parted with past practice and adopted European Union sanctions designed to punish Russia for invading Ukraine.
In response, Russia classified Switzerland as an unfriendly country. In August it rejected a protecting power mandate agreed by Switzerland and Ukraine, saying Switzerland was no longer neutral.
More
How neutral is Switzerland, really?
The war in Ukraine is forcing Switzerland to explain its neutrality.
Meanwhile, in Switzerland a domestic debate rages over how to interpret neutrality policy with two opposing camps.
One is conservative, mainly represented by the rightwing Swiss People’s Party, and wants to keep to a strict interpretation of neutrality. It is planning a people’s initiative that would incorporate comprehensive neutrality into the Swiss constitution.
The opposing, more liberal camp, which represents a majority of the government, is pushing for a more active role in international politics.
More
More
Switzerland will remain neutral – until it’s attacked
This content was published on
Switzerland is neutral. So why has it been cooperating with NATO and the EU on security issues for years?
Switzerland’s current policy of neutrality means it doesn’t take part in armed conflicts and doesn’t support any warring party. As a neutral country it also acts as diplomatic go-between when states partially or fully break off relations.
However, Switzerland no longer sees neutrality as blindly going it alone. This is why for some time it has maintained military partnerships with the Western defence alliance NATO and with its neighbouring countries.
More
Debate
Hosted by:
Bruno Kaufmann
What is the future for neutrality?
Neutrality is in the dock. Does it have a future? And how should it be defined?
This content was published on
The Lufthansa Group, which includes Swiss International Airlines (SWISS) has once again extended its flight ban to Israel.
Swiss hoteliers are cautiously optimistic for the winter season
This content was published on
Most Swiss hoteliers are cautiously optimistic about the coming winter season but increases costs are likely to weigh on margins.
Swiss foreign ministry memo on UNRWA funding raises alarm
This content was published on
According to a Swiss foreign ministry internal memo, cutting off UNRWA supplies to Gaza could be a violation of the Genocide Convention.
Swiss justice minister reiterates call for safeguard clause with EU
This content was published on
Swiss justice minister Beat Jans reiterated the Swiss demand for a safeguard clause in the free movement of persons with the EU.
Russia says Switzerland cannot represent its interests in Ukraine
This content was published on
Russia has said Switzerland cannot represent Ukrainian interests in Russia and Moscow’s interests in Ukraine because it is no longer neutral.
This content was published on
Analyst Daniel Warner looks at whether Russia’s refusal to have Switzerland act as go-between with Ukraine marks the end of an era.
This content was published on
Switzerland doesn’t take sides in a war. Thanks to its neutrality, it has been able to stay out of conflicts for a long time.
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch.